(PS) Miner v. Property Concepts Inc. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MADIHA MINER, No. 2:19-cv-01625-MCE-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PROPERTY CONCEPTS, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 14, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 18 were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 19 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. ECF No. 6. No objections were 20 filed. 21 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 22 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 23 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 24 1983). 25 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 26 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The findings and recommendations, ECF No. 6, are ADOPTED in full; 1 2. This action is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and 2 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 | Dated: February 4, 2020 5 □ 6 MORRISON C. he UNITED STATES DISTRI 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28