Deborah Rule v. Tempoe, LLC ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | DEBORAH RULE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00368-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH 13 v. PREJUDICE AS TO PLAINTIFF AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO PUTATIVE 14 | TEMPOE, LLC, CLASS 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 29) 16 17 Plaintiff, Deborah Rule, for herself and not on behalf of the putative class, and 18 | Defendant, Tempoe, LLC, have filed a stipulation to dismiss the action with prejudice as to 19 | Plaintiff Deborah Rule and without prejudice as to the putative class. (ECF No. 29.) In light of 20 | the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice as to Deborah Rule and 21 | without prejudice as to the putative class. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. City of San 22 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully 23 | directed to close this case. 24 T IS SO ORDERED. 25 26| Dated: _ February 10, 2020 [see hey 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27