Mity-Lite, Inc. v. Edsal Sandusky Corp. ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MITY-LITE, INC., CASE NO. 1:19-cv-01494 AWI JLT 12 Plaintiff, ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION (Doc. 15) 13 v. 14 EDSAL SANDUSKY CORPORATION, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice with each side to 18 bear their own fees and costs. (Doc. 15) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes 19 such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San 20 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close 21 this action. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: March 17, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28