Jackson v. USOPM/Legal Reconsideration & Appeals ( 2020 )

41.497 UV VETO LALLY Le NY bVVULIICEIt LY Viiliiav Payee +Vvic¢ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | DEBRA LYNN JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01452-DAD-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 Vv. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 | USOPM/LEGAL RECONSIDERATION & APPEALS, 15 (ECF No. 15) Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, Debra Lynn Jackson, and Defendant, USOPM/Legal Reconsideration & 19 | Appeals, have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 15). In 20 | light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 91 | 41(a\(1(A); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the 22 | Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. 23 IS SO ORDERED. 24 25| Dated: _ July 17, 2020 [Jee hey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27