Aileen Rizo v. Fresno County Office of Education ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 AILEEN RIZO, Case No. 1:14-cv-00423-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE 12 v. 13 FRESNO COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, 14 Defendant. 15 16 On February 25, 2019, the Supreme Court issued a decision vacating the decision of the 17 Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and remanding the matter for further decision. Yovino v. Rizo, 18 586 U.S. ___, No. 18-227 (Feb. 25, 2019) (per curiam). On February 26, 2019, this matter was 19 stayed and the parties were to notify the Court within fourteen days of the Ninth Circuit issuing a 20 decision. (ECF No. 71.) The Ninth Circuit issued a second decision affirming the denial of 21 summary judgment in this action on February 27, 2020. Rizo v. Yovino, No. 16-15372 (9th Cir. 22 Feb. 27, 2020). On July 2, 2020, the Supreme Court denied the petition. Yovino v. Rizo, No. 23 19-1176 (July 2, 2020). On July 6, 2020, the Ninth Circuit issued the mandate in this action. 24 (ECF No. 76.) According, to the order staying this action, the parties were to file a joint status 25 report within fourteen days of the mandate issuing in this action. 26 The parties have not complied with the February 26, 2019 order to file a joint status 27 report within fourteen days of the issuance of the mandate. The Court finds that it is appropriate to set a status conference in this action to address how this case shall proceed. wOAOe 4 LET OD SAD MMU fo POI eee PT Aye eo Ve 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. A telephonic status conference is set for July 28, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. in 3 Courtroom 9; 4 2. The parties shall appear at the hearing by calling (877) 336-1280, Access Code 5 1198646. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Zl Se g | Dated: _ July 21, 2020 OF 9 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28