(PC) Asoau v. County of Sacramento ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATTHEW ASOAN, No. 2:20-cv-1344 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 9, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to submit, within 30 days, a certified copy of his 18 inmate trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his 19 complaint and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. The thirty-day period 20 has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 22 court judge to this case; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to 25 the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served 26 with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. 27 The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 28 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time WADE CODY VE LOTT PLINY NEE MMV UTI ICM EITH ES PY oe 1 | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 2 | 1991). 3 | Dated: August 21, 2020 Lad | Cardp. k. □□□ CAROLYN K. DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 fi 9 asoal344.ifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28