R. Q. v. Tehachapi Unified School District ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 R.Q., by and through his guardian ad litem Case No.: 1:16-CV-01485 NONE JLT CHRIS QUATRO, 12 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE Plaintiff, 13 COURT TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE AND v. TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 (Doc. 104) TEHACHAPI UNIFIED SCHOOL 15 DISTRICT, 16 Defendants. 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice and with each side 18 to bear their own fees and costs1. (Doc. 104) The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes 19 such stipulations effective immediately with further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San 20 Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign 21 a district judge to this case and to close this action. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: November 4, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 1 The Court notes that the settlement approved by the Court includes payment of the plaintiff’s

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:16-cv-01485

Filed Date: 11/4/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024