(HC) Williams v. Lizarraga ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:18-cv-00748-AWI-JDP 12 Petitioner, ORDER REGARDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND REFERRING MATTER TO 13 v. FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE 14 JOE LIZARRAGA, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO SERVE DOCUMENTS 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Lawrence Williams is a state prisoner proceeding with a petition for writ of 18 habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The court has granted reconsideration of its order denying 19 appointment of counsel and now reevaluates whether to appoint counsel to petitioner. 20 There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. 21 See, e.g., Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986); Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 22 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958). However, the Criminal Justice Act authorizes the appointment of 23 counsel at any stage of the proceeding for financially eligible persons if “the interests of justice so 24 require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). To determine whether to appoint counsel, the “court must 25 evaluate the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the petitioner to articulate 26 his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved.” Weygandt v. Look, 718 27 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). 28 1 Petitioner is illiterate and suffers from schizophrenia. He is also deficient in 2 | communication and information processing. Petitioner’s mental impairments thus limit his ability 3 | to articulate his claims without counsel. Here, petitioner’s case also presents somewhat complex 4 | issues. His petition has survived a motion to dismiss, but the court has left the door open for 5 | further briefing on equitable tolling as well as review of the petition on the merits. See ECF No. 6 | 20at5. Thus, I find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel 7 | given the complexity of issues involved with respect to petitioner’s competency. 8 Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that: 9 1. The matter is referred to the Federal Public Defender’s Office to find counsel for 10 petitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). 11 2. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, a notice of appearance shall be filed 12 with the court by the attorney representing petitioner. 13 3. The clerk of court is directed to send a copy of this order to petitioner, the Federal 14 Public Defender’s Office, and respondent. 15 4. The clerk of court is directed to send a copy of the petitioner’s habeas corpus petition, 16 ECF No. 1, and respondent’s answer, ECF No. 31, to the Federal Public Defender’s 17 Office. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 ( Caan Dated: _ November 6, 2020 21 UNIT#D STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28