(PC) Negron v. White ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MIGUEL ANGEL NEGRON, No. 2:21-cv-0322 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 V. WHITE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed March 1, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 18 file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 19 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 21 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 22 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 23 the party is fully effective. 24 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 25 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 26 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 27 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 28 //// 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days 3 | after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 4 | with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 6 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 7 | Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 8 | Dated: April 5, 2021 Fens Arn 10 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE inegi0322.Fta 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28