(PC) Ruiz v. Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ALFONSO RUIZ, Case No. 1:20-cv-00179-DAD-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER 14 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 3, 2021, this Court adopted the magistrate judge’s Findings and 18 Recommendations to dismiss this action with leave to amend, due to Plaintiff’s failure to state a 19 cognizable claim. (Doc. 13.) On March 18, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff a thirty-day 20 extension of time to comply with its order. (Doc. 16.) Although more than the allowed time has 21 passed, Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint. 22 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide that the 23 “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for 24 the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” 25 L.R. 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in exercising that 26 power, may impose sanctions, including dismissal of an action. Thompson v. Housing Auth., City 27 of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986). A court may dismiss an action based on a 28 party’s failure to prosecute an action, obey a court order, or comply with local rules. See, e.g., 1 Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260–61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with 2 a court order to amend a complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 130-31 (9th Cir. 3 1987) (dismissal for failure to comply with a court order); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 4 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (dismissal for failure to prosecute and to comply with local rules). 5 Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause in writing, within 21 days of the date 6 of service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the 7 Court’s order. Alternatively, within that same time, Plaintiff may file a first amended complaint 8 or a notice of voluntary dismissal of this case. Failure to comply with this order will result in a 9 recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to state a claim and to obey a court 10 order. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: April 29, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28