Graham v. The Hertz Corporation ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK GRAHAM, individually and on Case No. 1:20-cv-00339-DAD-SKO behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF Plaintiff, COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 13 v. (Doc. 20) 14 THE HERTZ CORPORATION, 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 On June 1, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the entire action with 20 prejudice. (Doc. 20.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 21 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 22 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Sheila K. Oberto 25 Dated: June 2, 2021 /s/ . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28