(SS) Jennie Marie Looney v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JENNIE MARIE LOONEY, CIVIL NO. 1:20-cv-00401-HBK (SS) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’ JOINT STIPULATION UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 10 v. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) AND REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND REMANDING CASE 11 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 12 (Doc. No. 23) Defendant. 13 ORDER TO TERMINATE ALL PENDING MOTIONS AND DEADLINES 14 15 16 Pending before the court is the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand filed May 12, 17 2021. Doc. No. 23, Joint Stipulation. Plaintiff Jennie Marie Looney and the Commissioner of Social Security jointly stipulate to remand this case for further administrative proceedings under 18 sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and for judgment to be entered in plaintiff’s favor. Id. 19 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 20 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. See 21 Melkonyan v. Sullian, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991) (addressing issue of attorney’s fees under the 22 Equal Access to Justice Act and calculating deadline using date of final judgment). The Melkonyan 23 Court recognized 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) contemplates only two types of remands: a sentence four or a 24 sentence six remand. Id. at 98. A sentence four remand authorizes a court to enter “a judgment 25 affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Secretary, with or without resetting the cause 26 for a rehearing.” Id. at 98 (other citations omitted). 27 Here, the parties’ stipulation and proposed order seeks remand under sentence four and 28 1 reversal of the Commissioner’s final decision. Doc. 23. at 1-2. The parties further stipulate that 2 the Administrative Law Judge should “reevaluate the medical evidence, reassess the residual 3 functional capacity, and if required, offer the claimant the opportunity for a new hearing and take 4 further action, as warranted, to complete the administrative record.” Jd. at 1. 5 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 6 1. The court APPROVES the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. No. 23). 7 2. The Commissioner of Social Security’s decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the parties’ Joint Stipulation and this Order under sentence four, 42 U.S.C. § ° 405(g). 10 3. The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate any pending motions/deadlines and close this case. 12 B IT IS SO ORDERED. | Dated: _ May 19, 2021 Mile. Wh fareh Zaskth 15 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28