(PS) Liang v. Stockton Police Dept. ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KUANGHUEI LIANG, et al., No. 2:21-cv-00661-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs Kuanghuei Liang, Lijun Zhang, and Wen Sun (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), 19 individuals proceeding pro se, have filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 20 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On May 26, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 23 served on Plaintiffs and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and 24 recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 5.) No objections were 25 filed. 26 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 27 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 28 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 5), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 5 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice and without leave to amend, as duplicative 6 of Plaintiffs’ earlier-filed action in No. 2:20-cv-02520-TLN-DB; and 7 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 | DATED: July 1, 2021 10 /) “ \/ Mle 12 —ZNS ZN Troy L. Nunley» } 13 United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28