(PC) Schanck v. Haggard ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM KEITH SCHANCK, No. 2:18-cv-00328-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 LORI HAGGARD, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff William Keith Schanck (“Plaintiff”), a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se, 18 has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of 19 Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On May 7, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 22 were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 16.) Plaintiff has not filed 24 any objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court has reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards and finds the findings 26 and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 /// 1 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 7, 2021 (ECF No. 16), are ADOPTED 2 | IN FULL; and 3 2. The Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim for the reasons set forth in 4 | the March 19, 2021 Screening Order (ECF No. 14). See E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 | 41(b); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. 6 The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 | DATED: July 1, 2021 yy /) Sun Yasha Troy L. Nunley” . } United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28