(PC) Batton v. Zarate ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO BATTON, Case No. 1:21-cv-00571-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF 13 v. COUNSEL 14 A. ZARATE, et al., (Doc. 13) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. (Doc. 13.) 18 Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 19 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the Court cannot require an attorney to represent Plaintiff 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the S. Dist. of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 21 298 (1989). The Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel under section 1915(e)(1). 22 Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. However, without a reasonable method of securing and compensating 23 counsel, the Court will seek volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In 24 determining whether exceptional circumstances exist, the district court must evaluate both the 25 likelihood of success of the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in 26 light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Id. 27 In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Even 28 assuming that Plaintiff is not well-versed in the law and that he has made serious allegations, 1 which, if proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is not exceptional. This Court is faced with 2 similar cases almost daily. At this early stage in the proceedings, the Court cannot determine 3 whether Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits. Moreover, based on a review of the record, 4 the Court finds that Plaintiff can articulate his claims adequately. Id. 5 For the foregoing reasons, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s 6 motion for the appointment of counsel. (Doc. 13.) 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: July 7, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 10 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:21-cv-00571

Filed Date: 7/8/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024