(PC) Goins v. Bobbla ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND LEE GOINS, No. 2:18-cv-0034 TLN CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 A. DIMACULANGAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. There are two motions for summary judgment before the court. On May 25, 19 2021, plaintiff was granted until July 12, 2021 to file his responses to the motions and was 20 warned that failure to respond by July 12, 2021 would result in a recommendation that this action 21 be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed his responses. 22 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be 23 dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 1 | objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 2 || parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 3 || appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: July 23, 2021 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 goin0034 .46fr 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28