(PS)Seneka v. County of Yolo ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANA SENEKA, No. 2:20-cv-01621-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF YOLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Shana Seneka (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, has filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“§ 1983”). This matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On June 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 21 contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 22 fourteen days. (ECF No. 30.) That time period has passed and no party has objected to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 28 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed June 9, 2021 (ECF No. 30), are ADOPTED 3 IN FULL; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); and 5 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 | DATED: July 30, 2021 8 /) ? “ / eck LN Troy L. Nunley> } 11 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28