(PC) Gunn v. Stanton Correctional Facility ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AUMINTRIUS DAMOUR GUNN, No. 2: 21-cv-0456 JAM KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STANTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 By order filed July 8, 2021, plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. 19 (ECF No. 14.) The July 8, 2021 order stated that failure to file an amended complaint within that 20 time would result in the recommendation of dismissal of this action. (Id.) Thirty days from that 21 date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded 22 to the court’s order. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 24 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 || failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 || Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: August 17, 2021 Foci) Aharon 6 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 g Gunn456.fta(2) 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28