(PC) Meador v. Mendez ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GORDON DALE MEADOR, No. 2:19-cv-0587 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 P. MENDEZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 3, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was screened and was determined not to state a 21 claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 18. As a result, plaintiff was given thirty 22 days leave to file an amended complaint. See id. at 6. 23 On June 21, 2021, the court’s order was returned as inactive. Despite this fact, plaintiff 24 was properly served. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address 25 of the party is fully effective. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his 26 current address at all times, see Local Rule 183(b), and it appears that plaintiff has failed to 27 comply with this requirement. 28 //// ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a 2 || District Court Judge to this action. 3 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. 4 | See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days 7 || after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 8 | with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 9 || and Recommendations.” Plaintiff □□ advised that failure to file objections within the specified 10 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 11 Cir. 1991). 12 || DATED: September 9, 2021 ~ 13 AMhen—lChone ALLISON CLAIRE 14 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:19-cv-00587

Filed Date: 9/10/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024