Na Pier v. Ridgecrest Cinema, Ltd. ( 2021 )

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUZANNE NA PIER, an individual, Case No. 1:21-cv-00888-AWI-JLT 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSAL WITH 13 v. PREJUDICE (Doc. 9) 14 RIDGECREST CINEMA, LTD 15 Defendants. 16 17 The parties have stipulated to the action being dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 9) The 18 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 makes such stipulations effective immediately with 19 further order of the Court. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: September 9, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 23 CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28