Phillips-Kerley v. City of Fresno Fire Department ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID PHILLIPS-KERLEY, Case No. 1:18-cv-00438-AWI-BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 v. (Doc. No. 118) 14 CITY OF FRESNO, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 The Court adopts the amended stipulated protective order submitted by the parties on 19 September 10, 2021. (Doc. No. 118.) The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of 20 the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to this 21 protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies 22 with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal 23 shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non-dispositive motion or 24 compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors 25 Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document 26 filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall 27 be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed 28 confidential. 1 Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under this protective 2 order according to the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedures. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: September 13, 2021 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28