(PC) Harris v. Mkrtchyan ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMMETT HARRIS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 MKITCHYAN, RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 15 Defendant. DAYS 16 17 18 On June 28, 2021, the court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and dismissed 19 plaintiff’s second amended complaint. ECF No. 38. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a 20 third amended complaint. Id. He was subsequently granted an extension until August 25, 2021 to 21 file his amended complaint. ECF No. 40. Despite that extension, plaintiff has not filed a third 22 amended complaint. 23 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 24 litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute 25 or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. 26 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 27 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to 28 1 | administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. 2 | Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 3 Plaintiff will be given a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for 4 | his failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff's failure to respond to this order will constitute 5 | a failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action be 6 | dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this case 7 | should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. Should plaintiff wish 8 | to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within twenty-one days, a third amended complaint. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. ll ( ie - Dated: _ September 16, 2021 Q_—_—. 12 JEREMY D. PETERSON 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:19-cv-01040

Filed Date: 9/16/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024