(PC) Bradford v. DeJesus ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-1411 KJM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 S.DEJESUS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has submitted several motions including what the court construes as a motion to 18 proceed in forma pauperis. As indicated in the court’s September 3, 2021 order, plaintiff is 19 barred from proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Accordingly, the court will 20 recommend that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. 21 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court’s September 3, 2021 22 order that plaintiff pay the $402 filing fee within 14 days is vacated. 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 24 1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied; 25 2. Plaintiff be granted 14 days from the denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis 26 to pay the $402 filing fee; 27 3. All other outstanding motions be denied without prejudice until after plaintiff pays the 28 filing fee. ] These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 || assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen after 3 || being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 4 || the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 5 || Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 6 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 7 | 1991). 8 || Dated: September 16, 2021 / a8 } i | Ld , a ce CAROLYNK. DELANEY 10 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1] 12 13 | 4 14 brad1411.difip 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28