(PC) Walker v. Pacillas ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON PAUL WALKER, Case No. 1:21-cv-01128-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO SUBMIT APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 14 O. PACILLAS, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 On July 29, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff, within 45 days, to submit a court-provided 18 application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee for this action in full. (Doc. 3.) 19 Although more than the allowed time has passed, Plaintiff has not filed an IFP application, paid 20 the filing fee, or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. 21 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide that 22 “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for 23 the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” 24 Local Rule 110. “District courts have inherent power to control their dockets” and, in exercising 25 that power, may impose sanctions, including dismissal of an action. Thompson v. Housing Auth., 26 City of Los Angeles, 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986). A court may dismiss an action based on a 27 party’s failure to prosecute an action, obey a court order, or comply with local rules. See, e.g., 28 Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissal for failure to comply with a 1 court order to amend a complaint); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130-31 (9th Cir. 2 1987) (dismissal for failure to comply with a court order); Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 3 1424 (9th Cir. 1986) (dismissal for failure to prosecute and to comply with local rules). 4 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause in writing, within 21 days of the 5 date of service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed. Alternatively, within that 6 same time, Plaintiff may submit the application to proceed in forma pauperis provided by the 7 Court, completed and signed, or he may pay the $402 filing fee for this action in full. Failure to 8 comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 Dated: September 25, 2021 _ /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:21-cv-01128

Filed Date: 9/27/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024