(PC) Duque v. Alcazar ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JASON ALLEN DUQUE, No. 2:21-cv-0523 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MANNY ALCAZAR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 21, 2021 plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an 18 amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not 19 filed an amended complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 21 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 24 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 25 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 26 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 || waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 2 | 1991). 3 || Dated: November 5, 2021 Cad h Kt | ([z4 (g—, 4 CAROLYN K DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8] 1 9 duqu0523.fta 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28