(PC) Walker v. Davis ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON PAUL WALKER, 1:20-cv-00879-AWI-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE 13 vs. BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 DAVIS, et al., AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 8.) 16 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS 17 18 Aaron Paul Walker (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights 19 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action 20 on June 25, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On September 28, 2021, the court issued an order dismissing 21 the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend within thirty days. (ECF No. 8.) 22 The thirty-day deadline has now expired and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or 23 otherwise responded to the court’s order. As a result, there is no pleading on file which sets forth 24 any claims upon which relief may be granted. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 26 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this case be DISMISSED, with prejudice, based 27 on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s order and failure to state a claim 28 upon which relief may be granted under § 1983; and 1 2. The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 4 (14) days from the date of service of these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff may file 5 written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to 6 Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 7 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. 8 Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 9 (9th Cir. 1991)). 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: November 30, 2021 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:20-cv-00879

Filed Date: 12/1/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024