- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GUILLERMO ALEXANDER BRAN, No. 2:19-CV-0631-DMC-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SULMA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the 19 undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(c); see also ECF No. 38 (order reassigning action). 21 On October 26, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a status report within 30 22 days and cautioned Plaintiff that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the action. See 23 ECF No. 46. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a status report as ordered. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 28 1 It appears Plaintiff is currently incarcerated in El Salvador. 1 The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. 2 | See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal 3 | Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in 4 | expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to manage its own docket; (3) the risk of 5 || prejudice to opposing parties; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on their merits; 6 | and (5) the availability of less drastic sanctions. See id.; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 7 | 53 (9th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). A warning that the action may be dismissed as an appropriate 8 | sanction is considered a less drastic alternative sufficient to satisfy the last factor. See Malone, 9 | 833 F.2d at 132-33 & n.1. The sanction of dismissal for lack of prosecution is appropriate where 10 | there has been unreasonable delay. See Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421, 1423 (9th Cir. 11 | 1986). 12 Having considered these factors, and in light of Plaintiffs failure to file a status 13 | report as directed, the Court finds that dismissal of this action is appropriate. 14 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 15 1. This action is dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution and 16 | failure to comply with court rules and orders; and 17 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 18 19 | Dated: December 2, 2021 Ssvcqo_ 20 DENNIS M. COTA 21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:19-cv-00631
Filed Date: 12/2/2021
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024