(SS) Lewandowski v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 DORIE LEWANDOWSKI, CASE NUMBER: 1:21-cv-00024-GSA 7 Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF v. TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE 9 OPENING BRIEF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting 10 Commissioner of Social Security, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 The parties stipulate to a 60-day extension of time from December 31, 2021 to March 1, 15 2022 for Plaintiff to file an opening brief due to counsel’s pre-planned holiday travel and increased 16 workload given the increased number of Certified Administrative Records filed in previously 17 stayed cases. This is Plaintiff’s second extension and first request for an extension for cause. 18 The Scheduling Order allows for a single extension of thirty days by the stipulation of the 19 parties. Doc. 5 at 3. Beyond the single extension by stipulation, “requests to modify [the 20 scheduling] order must be made by written motion and will be granted only for good cause.” Id. 21 When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider 22 the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking 23 the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant 24 Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV- 25 01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent 26 power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious resolution of cases. Southern 27 California Edison Co. v. Lynch, 307 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2002). 28 Counsel identified good cause for the extension and sought it well in advance of the 1 December 31 deadline. Although an additional 60-day extension on top of the 30-days granted by 2 the scheduling order is substantial, the Court notes that the administrative record in this case 3 exceeds 2,000 pages. The extension is therefore warranted. 4 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s deadline to file an opening brief is extended 5 to and including March 1, 2022. All other deadlines are adjusted accordingly. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: December 13, 2021 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:21-cv-00024

Filed Date: 12/13/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024