Bluitt v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. ( 2022 )

Ne Ne el Ne ee ee ee ee □□ Ne ee Oe PDN tN te ON i oe oe □ sa _ wt — UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL FILED on Jan 05, 2022 MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION EASTERN DISTRICT OF □□□□□□□□□□ IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2974 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —-40) On December 16, 2020, the Panel transferred 49 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 510 F.Supp.3d 1376 (J.P.M.L. 2020). Since that time, 206 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Georgia. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Georgia and assigned to Judge May. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Georgia for the reasons stated in the order of December 16, 2020, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Leigh Martin May. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this □□□□□ period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. coal AU - Jan 05, 2022 : E CLERK’S OFFICE John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ATTEST: A TRUE COPY CERTIFIED THIS KEVIN P. WEIMER, Clerk we aa PS, xe aie By; S/R. Bachelor a IN RE: PARAGARD IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2974 SCHEDULE CTO−40 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 21−09802 Daisy Contreras v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE 2 21−02389 Bluitt v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 4 21−09848 Nichols v. Teva Women's Health, LLC et al CAN 3 21−09888 Botez v. Teva Women's Health, LLC et al