(SS) Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security ( 2022 )

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 MARIA TERESA HERNANDEZ, CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-00036-BAK-GSA 8 Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING SHOW CAUSE 9 v. AND GRANTING EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE A RESPONSE 10 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting BRIEF Commissioner of Social Security, 11 12 Defendant. 13 14 On January 27, 2022 the Court entered an order for Defendant to show cause why Defendant 15 did not file a response brief by the January 24 deadline. Doc. 18. Defendant responded on 16 February 3, 2022 indicating that counsel of record is out of the country, inadvertently missed the 17 deadline and neglected to seek an extension. Doc. 19. The parties now stipulate to an extension to 18 February 21, 2022 for Defendant to file the response brief. Doc. 20. 19 When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider 20 the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking 21 the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant 22 Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV- 23 01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal. May 19, 2020). The Court has the inherent 24 power to manage its own docket to achieve an orderly and expeditious resolution of cases. Southern 25 California Edison Co. v. Lynch, 307 F.3d 794 (9th Cir. 2002). 26 The inadvertently missed deadline was promptly addressed in Defendant’s response to the 27 show cause order and the extension is unopposed. 28 1 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order to show cause, Doc. 18, is VACATED and 2 Defendant’s deadline to file a response brief is EXTENDED to and including February 21, 2022. 3 All other deadlines are adjusted accordingly. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: February 3, 2022 /s/ Gary S. Austin 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28