(PC) Gittens v. Los Angeles County Superior Court ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUANE ANGELO GITTENS No. 2:20-cv-00781-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, et FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 By order filed June 4, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to 19 file an amended complaint was granted. Following multiple extensions of time, that deadline has 20 now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this 22 matter to a district court judge. 23 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 | (9th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: December 3, 2020 Pee a4 if / /, ; CAN fu fl. ay CAROLYN K. DELANEY 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 12/gitt078 1 .fta.docx 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28