Ronquillo v. Universal Recovery Corporation ( 2020 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 BECKY E. RONQUILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00248-DAD-SAB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE DOCKET TO 11 v. REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL 12 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE B UNIVERSAL RECOVERY CORPORATION, (ECF No. 17) 14 Defendant. 15 16 On September 10, 2018, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and 17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action 18 has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 19 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ 20 | fees. 21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case 22 | and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 23 54 | ITIS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 25 | Dated: _ December 14, 2020 ; 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28