- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH ANTHONY STAFFORD, No. 2:16-CV-1403-JAM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 DOSS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. Pending before 18 the Court is Plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 57, for the appointment of counsel. 19 The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to 20 require counsel to represent indigent plaintiffs in civil actions. See e.g. Mallard v. United States 21 Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may 22 request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. 23 Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th 24 Cir. 1990). In the present case, the Court does not at this time find the required exceptional 25 circumstances. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for the 2 | appointment of counsel, ECF No. 57, is denied. 3 4 5 || Dated: December 17, 2020 Ssvcqo_ 6 DENNIS M. COTA 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 2:16-cv-01403
Filed Date: 12/18/2020
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/19/2024