(PC) Hill v. Bartos ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KENNETH HILL, No. 2:20-cv-00221-TLN-CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BARTOS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Kenneth Hill (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 8, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has 23 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 16.) 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 27 The Court has carefully reviewed the entire file and finds the findings and 28 recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed December 8, 2020 (ECF No. 13), are 3 ADOPTED IN FULL; and 4 2. All claims and defendants other than those specifically identified in the magistrate 5 judge’s December 8, 2020 “Order and Findings and Recommendations” are DISMISSED. 6 DATED: January 13, 2021 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28