(PC) Lear v. McConnell ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RODERICK WILLIAM LEAR, No. 1:20-cv-00076-AWI-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER OF VOLUNTARILY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV. 13 v. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(ii) 14 ROBIN MCCONNELL, ET. AL. 15 Defendants. 16 On February 2, 2021, the parties’ filed a “Joint Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with 17 18 Prejudice,” stipulating to dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice, noting 19 that the parties have resolved the case in its entirety, and further noting each party bears their own 20 attorneys’ fees and costs. See Doc. No. 39. Considering the parties’ Joint Stipulation under Rule 21 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 22 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 23 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 24 1. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. No. 39) this is action is dismissed with 25 26 prejudice. 27 2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any pending motions and close 28 1 | this case. 2 > | tris so ORDERED. 4 5 | Dated: _ February 3, 2021 oo. WN fared Yack ‘ HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 8 9 10 i 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28