(PC) Jones v. Superior Court of Sacramento ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT CHARLES JONES, No. 2:20-cv-1102 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed December 28, 2020, plaintiff, a county prisoner, was ordered to file a 18 certified copy of his prison trust account statement and cautioned that failure to do so would 19 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. ECF No. 6. The thirty-day period has 20 now expired, and plaintiff has not filed his trust account statement or otherwise responded to the 21 order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 28 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 || time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 | (Oth Cir. 1991). 4 | DATED: February 5, 2021 ~ 5 Hthren— Lhar—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28