(PC)Flores v. California Correctional Women's Facility ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ENID MARIE FLORES, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01509-NONE-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 13 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 14 CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL EXTENSION OF TIME WOMEN’S FACILITY, et al., 15 (Doc. 26) Defendants. 16 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found it failed to state a cognizable claim. 19 (Doc. 21.) The Court directed her to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies 20 identified by the Court in the screening order, a notice of voluntary dismissal, or a notice of 21 election to stand on the complaint. Plaintiff previously sought and was granted an extension of 22 time to file a response. She now seeks a second extension of time. Good cause appearing, this 23 request will be granted. 24 In addition, plaintiff moves for the appointment of counsel on the ground that she has 25 fallen into a “deep depression” and has difficulty concentrating on her cases. Plaintiff does not 26 have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 27 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require an attorney to represent plaintiff pursuant to 28 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 1 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the court may request 2 the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 F.3d at 1525. 3 Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the court will seek 4 volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In determining whether 5 “exceptional circumstances exist, the district court must evaluate both the likelihood of success 6 of the merits [and] the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claims pro se in light of the 7 complexity of the legal issues involved.” Id. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 8 In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Even 9 if it is assumed that Plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that she has made serious 10 allegations which, if proved, would entitle her to relief, her case is not exceptional. This court is 11 faced with similar cases almost daily. Further, at this early stage in the proceedings, the Court 12 cannot determine whether Plaintiff is likely to succeed on the merits and based on a review of the 13 record in this case, the Court does not find that Plaintiff cannot adequately articulate her claims. 14 Finally, in support of her motion, Plaintiff submits a medical form dated November 3, 15 2020, from Dr. Gabriel Sanchez Aldana, Jr., MD-FP, affiliated with the Northeast Community 16 Clinics. (Doc. 26 at 3.) Dr. Aldana notes that Plaintiff has been diagnosed with several conditions, 17 including diabetes, new onset tremor, obesity, lumbar degenerative disc disease, and depression. 18 He further writes that “Patient is currently experiencing a depression relapse and is having 19 extreme difficulty with concentration and cannot focus on current court procedings [sic] and legal 20 matters. Referrals and medications have been initiated.” Id. While it appears that Plaintiff suffers 21 from multiple health conditions, this document, standing alone, does not indicate that she is 22 unable to articulate her claims or prosecute this action. This request will therefore be denied. 23 //// 24 //// 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is GRANTED. She 2 shall file her first amended complaint within thirty days from the date of this order. Failure to do 3 so may result in a recommendation to dismiss this action for failure to comply with a court order 4 and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: March 17, 2021 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 1:19-cv-01509

Filed Date: 3/18/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/19/2024