(PC) Jones v. Superior Court of Sacramento ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT CHARLES JONES, No. 2:20-cv-01102-TLN-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Robert Charles Jones (“Plaintiff”), a county prisoner, has filed this civil rights 19 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On February 8, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 23 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has 24 not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 25 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 26 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 27 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 28 1 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 2 || supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed February 8, 2021 (ECF No. 7), are 5 | ADOPTED IN FULL; and 6 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 || DATED: March 19, 2021 o> /) 9 “ \/ of bw 10 ZN □□ Troy L. Nunley } 11 United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28