(PC) Pile v. Becker ( 2021 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JACOB M. PILE, No. 2:20-cv-0728 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BECKER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 18 matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 19 Local Rule 302. 20 On January 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that he could file objections to the 22 findings and recommendations. The time for filing objections has passed and plaintiff has not 23 filed objections. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having 27 reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record 28 and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 11, 2021 are adopted in full; and 3 2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. 4 5 DATED: March 19, 2021 /s/ John A. Mendez 6 THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28