(PC) McCullom v. Withrow ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN LEE McCULLOM, Case No. 2:21-cv-00378-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR 13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 PATRICK WITHROW, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 15 Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On June 12, 2022, I screened plaintiff’s complaint, notified him that it did not state 18 cognizable claims, and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 7.1 I also 19 ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing fee or a complete application 20 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Id. To date, plaintiff has not complied with that order. 21 To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. 22 The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders 23 or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. 24 Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 25 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer 26 1 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the June 12, 2022 order was 27 returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents 28 at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 | justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 2 | F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 3 Plaintiff will be given a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for 4 | his failure to file an amended complaint and for his failure to either pay the filing fee or submit an 5 | application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to respond to this order will 6 | constitute a failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this 7 | action be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why 8 | this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to state a claim. Should 9 | plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall file, within twenty-one days, an amended 10 | complaint and either pay the $402 filing fee or submit a complete application for leave to proceed 11 | in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to send to plaintiff the court’s form application 12 | for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 13 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 ( 1 Ow — Dated: _ August 22, 2022 Q_—— 16 JEREMY D. PETERSON 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Document Info

Docket Number: 2:21-cv-00378

Filed Date: 8/22/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/20/2024