Brown v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BONNIE BROWN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00265-ADA-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO ADDRESS 12 DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION v. SOLUTIONS, INC. IN RELATION TO 13 READINESS FOR SCHEDULING EXPERIAN INFORMATION CONFERENCE 14 SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., (ECF Nos. 3, 9) 15 Defendants. DEADLINE: JUNE 6, 2023 16 17 Plaintiff initiated this action on February 20, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) On March 17, 2023, 18 and on April 14, 2023, Defendants Trident Asset Management and LVNV Funding, filed 19 answers. (ECF Nos. 5, 7.) However, Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc., has not 20 appeared in the action, and Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service regarding this Defendant on 21 the docket. The mandatory scheduling conference is set for June 8, 2023, and a joint scheduling 22 was due June 1, 2023. (ECF No. 3.) On June 2, 2023, after the deadline to do so expired, 23 Plaintiff filed a joint scheduling report on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendants Trident Asset 24 Management and LVNV Funding. (ECF No. 9.) However, the joint scheduling report does not 25 provide any information regarding Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. 26 Rule 4(m) provides that “If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is 27 filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action 28 without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” 1 | Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). “But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend 2 | the time for service for an appropriate period.” Id. The order setting the scheduling conference in 3 | this matter additionally provides that: “plaintiff shall diligently pursue service of the summons 4 | and complaint and dismiss those defendants against whom the plaintiff will not pursue claims . . 5 | .[and] plaintiff shall promptly file proofs of service of the summons and complaint so the Court 6 | has a record of service.” (ECF No. 3 at 1.) “Failure to timely serve the summons and complaint 7 | may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of unserved defendants.” (Id. at 2.) 8 | The order additionally provides that “[a] Jomt Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and 9 | executed by all parties, shall be filed one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference.” □□□□□ 10 | Local Rule 110 provides that “[flailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or 11 | with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions 12 | ... within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its 13 || docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including 14 | dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000). 15 Plaintiff shall be required to address the lack of proof of service filed on the docket as 16 || required by the Court’s order, and address whether Defendant Experian Information Solutions, 17 | Inc., has been served or will be dismissed from this action, in relation to the general readiness of 18 | this action for a scheduling conference. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on or before June 6, 2023, Plaintiff shall 20 | provide a supplement to the joint scheduling report addressing Defendant Experian Information 21 | Solutions, Inc., request an extension of time to complete service pursuant to Rule 4(m), or 22 | otherwise dismiss Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. from this action. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. OF. nf ee 95 | Dated: _ June 5, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28