(PS) Vaughn v. Tatar ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JULIAN VAUGHN, Case No. 2:23-cv-00672-JAM-JDP (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 14 UNITED FREIGHT LINES, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The court previously issued an order setting an initial scheduling conference for October 18 5, 2023, and directing the parties to file status reports by no later than September 21, 2023. ECF 19 No. 18. Defendants timely submitted a status report. Plaintiff, however, failed to file his own 20 status report. 21 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 22 litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, 23 for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. 24 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 25 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to 26 administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. 27 Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. 28 1 The court will give plaintiff the opportunity to explain why sanctions should not be 2 | imposed for failure to file a status report. Plaintiff’s failure to respond to this order will constitute 3 | another failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action 4 | dismissed. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall also file a status report 5 || as required by the court’s August 21, 2023 order. 6 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: 7 1. The initial scheduling conference currently set for October 5, 2023, is continued to 8 | November 9, 2023. 9 2. By no later than October 26, 2023, plaintiff shall file a status report in accordance with 10 | the court’s August 21, 2023 order. See ECF No. 18. 11 3. Plaintiff shall show cause, by no later than October 26, 2023, why sanctions should not 12 | be imposed for failure to comply with the court’s August 21, 2023 order. 13 4. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a 14 || recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply 15 | with court orders. 16 ITIS SO ORDERED. 18 ( A Oy — Dated: _ October 4, 2023 a——— 19 JEREMY D. PETERSON 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28