Firat v. January Technologies, Inc. ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MANDY FIRAT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00993-EPG 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE IN LIGHT OF PLAINTIFF’S 13 JANUARY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., VOLUNTARY NOTICE OF DISMISSAL 14 Defendant. (ECF No. 7) 15 16 17 On August 29, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 7), with 18 | prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)G), as Defendant has not filed 19 | an answer or motion for summary judgment. Therefore, this action has been terminated with 20 | prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)G); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 21 || 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 | Dated: _ August 30, 2022 [Jee Fey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28