(PC) Jones v. Aguwa ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACY EUGENE JONES, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1207 JLT SAB ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, GRANTING 13 v. ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, ) DENYING THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 HENRY C. AGUWA, et al. ) JUDGMENT AS MOOT, AND DISMISSING THE ) ACTION 15 Defendants. ) ) (Docs. 46, 47, 48) 16 ) 17 The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action. (Doc. 48.) The 18 magistrate judge noted Plaintiff had failed to comply with the Court’s orders; his failure to respond to 19 discovery “hindered the ultimate resolution of this case;” and Defendants would suffer prejudice due 20 to Plaintiff’s actions. (Id. at 3-4.) The magistrate judge observed Plaintiff was previously warned that 21 failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in dismissal of the action. (Id. at 4.) The 22 magistrate judge concluded “no lesser sanction will deter Plaintiff from the kind of misconduct he has 23 engaged in.” particularly given that Plaintiff received a warning that (Id.) Therefore, the magistrate 24 judge recommended terminating sanctions be imposed and the action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) 25 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on the parties on January 27, 2023, and 26 the parties were informed that any objections must be filed within fourteen days of the date of service. 27 (Doc. 48 at 5.) In addition, the Court informed the parties that the “failure to file objections within the 28 specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal.” (Id. at 5, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 1 || F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014), Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991).) To date, no 2 || party has filed objections, and the deadline to do so has expired. 3 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court conducted a de novo review of this case. 4 || Having carefully reviewed the entire matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations 5 || are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 6 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on January 27, 2023 (Doc. 48), are 7 ADOPTED in full. 8 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 47) the action is GRANTED. 9 3. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 46) is denied as MOOT. 10 4. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. 11 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 12 13 ||IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 || Dated: _ February 17, 2023 ( LAW ph L. wan 15 TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28