(PC) Kjeldergaard v. Easmon ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NICKOLAS GORDON No. 2:22-cv-01283-CKD P KJELDERGAARD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER AND v. 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS EASMON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 By order filed January 12, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 19 to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff 20 has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this 22 matter to a district judge. 23 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 || (9th Cir. 1991). 4 || Dated: February 22, 2023 Card Kt | / py la 4 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 1] 12 || 12/kjel1283.fta(1) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28