De Los Santos v. Acosta ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 | CHRISTINE DE LOS SANTOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00397-JLT-BAK (SAB) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE 11 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) 12 | OFFICER ACOSTA, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 13 Defendants. (ECF No. 23) 14 15 On August 31, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. (ECF No. 23.) In light 16 | of the notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i1); Wilson 17 | v.City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice, 18 | with each party to bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 19 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjust 20 | the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 FA. 3 | Dated: _September 1, 2022 " UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28