(PC) Consiglio v. Hall ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT g EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAM CONSIGLIO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00871-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 11 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS 12 EVETTE HALL, et al., (ECF No. 2) 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 | § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 18 | are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 19 | Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 20 In the instant action, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2.) 21 | Examination of the application reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. 22 | Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 23 IS SO ORDERED. 24 FA. Pated: _ June 9, 2023 ; UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28