- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIA MORALES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00572-HBK1 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER 13 v. THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING (Doc. No. 27) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL 15 SECURITY, 16 Defendant. 17 18 This matter comes before the Court upon a sua sponte review of the docket.2 Pending 19 before the Court is the parties’ stipulated motion for award of attorney’s fees filed on June 28, 20 2022. (Doc. No. 27). The parties agree to an award of attorney’s fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s 21 attorney, Jacqueline A. Forslund of Forslund Law LLC, in the amount of $8,800.00 in attorney 22 fees and expenses, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. 23 24 1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10). 25 2 The Court apologizes for the undue delay in granting the requested relief and urges counsel not to 26 hesitate to contact chambers sooner in the future should it appear a pleading may have been overlooked. Because the pleading was filed as a stipulation and not as a motion, the undersigned was not alerted that 27 any pleading required the court’s attention, especially because the case was closed. The parties are advised that when court attention is required for any requested relief, even if the parties stipulate to the 28 requested relief, the parties must file the pleading as a motion in CMECF, not as a stipulation. 1 (Id.). 2 On March 31, 2022, this Court remanded the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 3 405(g) to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 25). Judgment 4 was entered the same day. (Doc. No. 26). Plaintiff now requests an award of fees as the 5 prevailing party. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a) & (d)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1); see 28 U.S.C. § 6 1920; cf. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993) (concluding that a party who wins a 7 sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is a prevailing party). The Commissioner 8 does not oppose the requested relief. 9 The EAJA provides for an award of attorney fees to private litigants who both prevail in 10 civil actions (other than tort) against the United States and timely file a petition for fees. 28 11 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Under the Act, a court shall award attorney fees to the prevailing party 12 unless it finds the government’s position was “substantially justified or that special circumstances 13 make such an award unjust.” Id. Here, the government did not show its position was 14 substantially justified and the Court finds there are not special circumstances that would make an 15 award unjust. 16 Based on the stipulation, the Court finds an award of $8,800.00 in attorney fees and 17 expenses is appropriate. EAJA fees, expenses, and costs are subject to any offsets allowed under 18 the Treasury Offset Program (“TOP”), as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 532 U.S. 1192 (2010). If 19 the Commissioner determines upon effectuation of this Order that Plaintiff’s EAJA fees are not 20 subject to any offset allowed under the TOP, the fees shall be delivered or otherwise transmitted 21 to Plaintiff’s counsel. 22 //// 23 //// 24 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 25 1. The stipulated motion for attorney fees and expenses (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED. 26 2. The Commissioner is directed to pay to Plaintiff as the prevailing party EAJA fees in 27 the amount of $8,800.00 in attorney fees and expenses. Unless the Department of Treasury 28 determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government shall make payment of the EAJA 1 | fees to Plaintiff's counsel, Jacqueline A. Forslund of Forslund Law LLC, in accordance with 2 | Plaintiff's assignment of fees and subject to the terms of the stipulated motion. 3 “| Dated: _ February 24, 2023 Wile. Lh fareh Hack 5 HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA ‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Document Info
Docket Number: 1:20-cv-00572
Filed Date: 2/27/2023
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/20/2024