(PC)Maldonado v. Kebler ( 2022 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILLY RAY SHANEE MALDONADO, No. 2:22-cv-0923 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. 14 B. KEBLER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed July 25, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within thirty days 18 and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this action. ECF No. 7. The 19 thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded 20 to the order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 27 //// 28 //// 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 | (th Cir. 1991). 4 | DATED: September 6, 2022. 5 . ~ 6 Htttenr— Lhor—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28