R.S. v. County of Stanislaus ( 2023 )

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 R.S., individually and as successor in No. 1:20-cv-01170-ADA-SKO interest to Rudy Santillan, Sr., deceased, et 12 al., 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 v. (Doc. 55) 15 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On February 27, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 20 prejudice. (Doc. 55.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 21 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 22 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: February 28, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28